The 2010 budget of the Municipality of Pesaro can not suffer like the other municipalities of the unfavorable economic situation and the negative economic situation.
why puzzles us the basic approach of this document that goes in the direction completely opposite to what is required at the national Democratic Party from the government or protecting vulnerable groups, especially children and the elderly, especially those families in need with a number of more than two children, in general, protect the social welfare and that in today's economy are the sectors that could suffer the most out of this situation.
continue as the only weapon of defense to argue that the government cut funding when the variance in state transfers between the final / definitive 2009 and 2010 estimates is minimal compared to the millions euro in the general budget is proof that those who come from the council majority are critical instrument for creating political alibi that now leave the time they find. Other
speech is related to the Stability Pact, where instead it is necessary to make a common front as is the case now in all major municipalities such as Milan or Rome to try to sensitize the Minister on the variation of those parameters that next year could put on notice to municipalities with a virtuoso media.
The City Council in this report has made a clear choice and state that is to increase the revenues stemming from public services through increases in rates and particularly on services to individual demand.
And so tonight will be approved increases in the rates of nurseries and kindergartens, and increases in fees in nursing homes and residential and social services in general, increases to take advantage of the facilities and sporting facilities over the confirmation to 3.5 million € of the income from traffic fines that, despite being repeated by our administrators that the conduct of Pesaro motorists have become more correct, are always absolutely confirmed at exorbitant figures for a city like Pesaro and confirming that this item has become a permanent and continuous source of funding for our town. So
a real attack on the welfare system and family in particular, that wife is ill with the statements of protection and preservation made in defense of the City of Pesaro by our advisors and directors of the majority.
What you need to point out is that the choices made by the City Council in this budget can not be passed off as choice for lack of resources.
The 2010 budget contains detailed policy directions and in fact precise direction of this administration has wanted to give to their citizens and that unfortunately we are going in totally opposite direction to those who should be the guiding principles of a municipal budget at a time of serious economic difficulties like this one or the solidarity and the protection of vulnerable groups.
And do not count now either signed memoranda of understanding with the union to get protection policies only on economic maneuvers like this because people are now realizing their skin from their pockets and above that there is a City government that is implementing tariff increases in all sectors at the expense of a trade union and that is that instead of protecting them is the same game of municipal administrators.
And in this context the search of financial resources is especially agonizing to see the voice of entries zero contributions and transfers from the European community, and real tangible sign that our municipality is continuing to ignore a very important source of funding that could at least partly alleviate the increases that are approved with this Budget.
Not to mention the streamlining and cost savings that should have been the director of a municipal budget carrier in a difficult economic period like this and that instead, since this budget, we can claim to have been implemented only in small part compared to what could be done, particularly on expenditure restraint for so-called intermediate consumption.
And when it comes to rationalize spending is the basic concept is wrong. For the City Council, as quoted in the accounting records, rationalize the current spending means restraining the increase. For us to rationalize the expense, however, means removing unnecessary items and waste.
Yet there was just a sort of handbook developed by the General Accounting Office and implemented in a circular by Minister Tremonti, where you invite the government to implement all possible measures to prevent the growth of certain types and to identify savings such as in personnel costs, and especially in the form of incentives and rewards that are most used by our joint collaboration and consultancy costs, costs for bodies, for public relations expenses, expenses for sponsorship, for incentives for the design of public works, postage and telephone also to encourage the use of electronic mail.
All restrictions, if implemented rigorously, could provide significant savings to our institution and therefore limit the increases to our citizens.
As for the three-year plan of public works, the setting is respectable given the Councillor Bridle to favor the safety of school buildings, some of whom are really in a position of concern.
We would, however, stressed that other areas within the public works, deserve equal dignity. First and foremost the
una5 road safety must be priorities for our common especially after bad weather and snowfall last week, has poor roads to the limit of practicality. Hence, even with respect to the plan drawn up by the asphalting of municipal offices, you need to allocate more funds to restore a situation of traffic that now has severe symptoms of danger for the mobility of our citizens.
According to the maintenance and preservation of the cultural heritage of the city. And here you just do a typical example which includes both the conditions or the Library Oliveriana represents a heritage of the city where for months it rains inside the building and where the only intervention put in place to address this situation was the purchase of containers to collect rainwater. A situation which is intolerable and that it represents yet another proof that this city administration is not defending the cultural treasures of the city but rather seeks to alienate, as happened to Perticari Palace, those goods that are experiencing severe structural conditions are forgetting that if you reached those conditions of decay is the primary responsibility of the municipality that has continued and continues to be lacking in maintenance work on assets of our city.
Ultimately, this first budget of the new administration is very Ceriscioli disappointing both in terms of policy direction from the point of view of consistency and collegiality of the City Council that unfolds then broken down into shares of the councilors as occurred in the affairs of kindergartens and nursery schools or fees on waste.
The city needs stronger action and a leap in quality that today, unfortunately, this local government does not seem to be able to give. Continue to engage in financial statements such as this in such difficult economic times, the sole denominator criminalization of families, means facing surface citizens' problems and not realize the economic and social context in which it is experiencing.
why puzzles us the basic approach of this document that goes in the direction completely opposite to what is required at the national Democratic Party from the government or protecting vulnerable groups, especially children and the elderly, especially those families in need with a number of more than two children, in general, protect the social welfare and that in today's economy are the sectors that could suffer the most out of this situation.
continue as the only weapon of defense to argue that the government cut funding when the variance in state transfers between the final / definitive 2009 and 2010 estimates is minimal compared to the millions euro in the general budget is proof that those who come from the council majority are critical instrument for creating political alibi that now leave the time they find. Other
speech is related to the Stability Pact, where instead it is necessary to make a common front as is the case now in all major municipalities such as Milan or Rome to try to sensitize the Minister on the variation of those parameters that next year could put on notice to municipalities with a virtuoso media.
The City Council in this report has made a clear choice and state that is to increase the revenues stemming from public services through increases in rates and particularly on services to individual demand.
And so tonight will be approved increases in the rates of nurseries and kindergartens, and increases in fees in nursing homes and residential and social services in general, increases to take advantage of the facilities and sporting facilities over the confirmation to 3.5 million € of the income from traffic fines that, despite being repeated by our administrators that the conduct of Pesaro motorists have become more correct, are always absolutely confirmed at exorbitant figures for a city like Pesaro and confirming that this item has become a permanent and continuous source of funding for our town. So
a real attack on the welfare system and family in particular, that wife is ill with the statements of protection and preservation made in defense of the City of Pesaro by our advisors and directors of the majority.
What you need to point out is that the choices made by the City Council in this budget can not be passed off as choice for lack of resources.
The 2010 budget contains detailed policy directions and in fact precise direction of this administration has wanted to give to their citizens and that unfortunately we are going in totally opposite direction to those who should be the guiding principles of a municipal budget at a time of serious economic difficulties like this one or the solidarity and the protection of vulnerable groups.
And do not count now either signed memoranda of understanding with the union to get protection policies only on economic maneuvers like this because people are now realizing their skin from their pockets and above that there is a City government that is implementing tariff increases in all sectors at the expense of a trade union and that is that instead of protecting them is the same game of municipal administrators.
And in this context the search of financial resources is especially agonizing to see the voice of entries zero contributions and transfers from the European community, and real tangible sign that our municipality is continuing to ignore a very important source of funding that could at least partly alleviate the increases that are approved with this Budget.
Not to mention the streamlining and cost savings that should have been the director of a municipal budget carrier in a difficult economic period like this and that instead, since this budget, we can claim to have been implemented only in small part compared to what could be done, particularly on expenditure restraint for so-called intermediate consumption.
And when it comes to rationalize spending is the basic concept is wrong. For the City Council, as quoted in the accounting records, rationalize the current spending means restraining the increase. For us to rationalize the expense, however, means removing unnecessary items and waste.
Yet there was just a sort of handbook developed by the General Accounting Office and implemented in a circular by Minister Tremonti, where you invite the government to implement all possible measures to prevent the growth of certain types and to identify savings such as in personnel costs, and especially in the form of incentives and rewards that are most used by our joint collaboration and consultancy costs, costs for bodies, for public relations expenses, expenses for sponsorship, for incentives for the design of public works, postage and telephone also to encourage the use of electronic mail.
All restrictions, if implemented rigorously, could provide significant savings to our institution and therefore limit the increases to our citizens.
As for the three-year plan of public works, the setting is respectable given the Councillor Bridle to favor the safety of school buildings, some of whom are really in a position of concern.
We would, however, stressed that other areas within the public works, deserve equal dignity. First and foremost the
una5 road safety must be priorities for our common especially after bad weather and snowfall last week, has poor roads to the limit of practicality. Hence, even with respect to the plan drawn up by the asphalting of municipal offices, you need to allocate more funds to restore a situation of traffic that now has severe symptoms of danger for the mobility of our citizens.
According to the maintenance and preservation of the cultural heritage of the city. And here you just do a typical example which includes both the conditions or the Library Oliveriana represents a heritage of the city where for months it rains inside the building and where the only intervention put in place to address this situation was the purchase of containers to collect rainwater. A situation which is intolerable and that it represents yet another proof that this city administration is not defending the cultural treasures of the city but rather seeks to alienate, as happened to Perticari Palace, those goods that are experiencing severe structural conditions are forgetting that if you reached those conditions of decay is the primary responsibility of the municipality that has continued and continues to be lacking in maintenance work on assets of our city.
Ultimately, this first budget of the new administration is very Ceriscioli disappointing both in terms of policy direction from the point of view of consistency and collegiality of the City Council that unfolds then broken down into shares of the councilors as occurred in the affairs of kindergartens and nursery schools or fees on waste.
The city needs stronger action and a leap in quality that today, unfortunately, this local government does not seem to be able to give. Continue to engage in financial statements such as this in such difficult economic times, the sole denominator criminalization of families, means facing surface citizens' problems and not realize the economic and social context in which it is experiencing.
0 comments:
Post a Comment