The annual figures for 2009 of the municipality of Pesaro confirm those that have been criticism of the account from the previous estimate in the City Council while it is necessary to acknowledge that the new commissioner, at least, something in terms of rationalization of costs, unlike his predecessor, has begun to do.
And this is also a sign that those who come from the opposition benches are not always critical equipment but more often than not have substance.
I want from the 2009 budget which was the balance of fines and fines with 550mila € allocated more than in 2008, reflecting the rise of indiscriminate parking fee, the ZTL cameras whose activation is also delayed and VideoReDo notorious that, in addition to have created legal problems, could still create financial problems to our common if the sentences were to be confirmed by the magistrate who ruled in favor of the applicants.
2009 was the year of the removal and sale of Perticari Palace, historic building in the city, an operation that was part of the policy undertaken by the old Board of constant recourse to a private sale of premium properties in the capital city on the ground the scarcity of financial resources.
E 'was the year in which there was evidence of the € 400 thousand in less than gains on investments resulting from the merger Megas Spa / Multiservice Marche. Operation has confirmed that highly political, which took no account of technical assessments nor economic ones as we had already denounced as opposition in the vote by the Merger and who regularly has yielded only Pesaro a loss of 800 million lire, which certainly does not have protected the citizens of our city, but only to maintain positions of power by the political class that manages our municipality and provinciale.E we could easily continue to emphasize and highlight the shortcomings of a budget born poor planning and policies aimed not only to tap funds to the centers of power that election, in fact, have regularly reconfirmed their confidence in the center-left coalition.
The final account, in approving this afternoon, he tells us first that the net tax revenue, including income tax sharing and the value for the abolition of the ICI first home, fell into a percentage that does not even meet the 2.5 % offset by the extra tax revenue and the total current revenue even higher in 2008 of € 1 million 200 thousand euro.
is then that this figure shows that perhaps the criticism of the government were somewhat excessive and unjustified, and have served only to create the media hype on the part of town to hide its political responsibility and to justify cuts in several areas.
What this does not apply in the Stability Pact, where it is fair to say, however, that the parameters for the year 2010 and especially 2011 are not sustainable for any local authority, including the city of Pesaro, and it is right on this issue there is the mobilization of all the directors of the center right and center left so that they are revised.
This balance sheet has however shown that the policy of increasing income from increased charges for the services on individual demand has begun to bear fruit if it is true that income from such established for the residential and social services as nursing home fees have increased by 100 thousand euro compared to the final, that the income from sporting and cultural services increased by € 30 000, that a number of children have earned income 328 000 € more than in the final appropriation . It is, however, forgot to say that these are services that directly affect citizens and that have increased in these values \u200b\u200bmeans going to affect the household budget.
So then is not exactly right on with what was reported that the government got their hands in the pockets of the municipal administration. I would say better than the local council, with the resources available, did not forward-looking policy choices and to support the municipal budget is due to go to get their hands into the pockets of citizens. And by the way - even if it has little to do with the budget - should be with the news of the Municipality of Pesaro and not a party newsletter or City Council because the latest issue arrived in the homes of people these days and which the special budget 2010 is absolutely biased.
I return to the balance sheet when the numbers tell us that much more could be done in terms of rationalization and cost savings based on the concept that I have already stated in the budget debate in the 2010 or rationalize that spending should not mean how does the City Council contain increase but eliminate unnecessary items and waste.
many more savings could be for example in personnel costs, which is one of the most significant budget items, when you try not to replace those who retire at the same time give you about 650 thousand euro in productivity bonuses?
And yet when it finally deletes those items disguised as consulting fees for those partnerships and incentives for the design, planning and public works sector, which affect far too heavily on the municipal budget?
Not to mention the cost of the collegial bodies of the costs for public relations and expenditure for sponsorship. Here
Councillor there are entries where our town could easily cut without affecting the citizens, without going to require retroactive figures on educational policies for families or trying to save money on evening and night shifts of the municipal police when one of the main demands by the people is to have more security and protection of the territory.
So this rationalization of expenditure should be supporting the Director of the budgets of future years because the resources available, there will be any government in office, will always be less and the negative impact will be primarily on the budgets of local authorities and then municipalities.
room for maneuver there are as there are items to be developed in terms of revenue growth and are those relating to contributions and transfers from the European community, which in the final budget for 2009 are € 10 thousand and even in the budget 2010 equal to zero while there are local authorities have made this entry a real source of funding that could alleviate, in our budget, increases in taxes and tariffs.
Ultimately, this final 2009 budget is the typical pre-and post-election, with the estimate made by a committee, and the annual accounts approved by another, where we tried to achieve the political objective which was to reconfirm that the electoral administration adopting policies and making outgoing budget absolutely sluggish economy.
But the city and citizens need more and that is what we see in the Budget in future years that will not be possible vivacchiare as in this final but they will need very different political and economic strategies.
This signal was expecting from the 2010 budget, but again we were disappointed because the basic approach of that document had to be that the protection of vulnerable groups, especially children and the elderly, families in difficulty, especially those with a number of children over two, in general, protect the social welfare and that in today's economy are the sectors most affected. So instead it was not.
Continue to engage in operations budget pretending to be unaware of the economic crisis, social and financial means to address the surface surrounding the citizens' problems without solving the same time the critical economic and financial affairs of the Municipality.
And this is also a sign that those who come from the opposition benches are not always critical equipment but more often than not have substance.
I want from the 2009 budget which was the balance of fines and fines with 550mila € allocated more than in 2008, reflecting the rise of indiscriminate parking fee, the ZTL cameras whose activation is also delayed and VideoReDo notorious that, in addition to have created legal problems, could still create financial problems to our common if the sentences were to be confirmed by the magistrate who ruled in favor of the applicants.
2009 was the year of the removal and sale of Perticari Palace, historic building in the city, an operation that was part of the policy undertaken by the old Board of constant recourse to a private sale of premium properties in the capital city on the ground the scarcity of financial resources.
E 'was the year in which there was evidence of the € 400 thousand in less than gains on investments resulting from the merger Megas Spa / Multiservice Marche. Operation has confirmed that highly political, which took no account of technical assessments nor economic ones as we had already denounced as opposition in the vote by the Merger and who regularly has yielded only Pesaro a loss of 800 million lire, which certainly does not have protected the citizens of our city, but only to maintain positions of power by the political class that manages our municipality and provinciale.E we could easily continue to emphasize and highlight the shortcomings of a budget born poor planning and policies aimed not only to tap funds to the centers of power that election, in fact, have regularly reconfirmed their confidence in the center-left coalition.
The final account, in approving this afternoon, he tells us first that the net tax revenue, including income tax sharing and the value for the abolition of the ICI first home, fell into a percentage that does not even meet the 2.5 % offset by the extra tax revenue and the total current revenue even higher in 2008 of € 1 million 200 thousand euro.
is then that this figure shows that perhaps the criticism of the government were somewhat excessive and unjustified, and have served only to create the media hype on the part of town to hide its political responsibility and to justify cuts in several areas.
What this does not apply in the Stability Pact, where it is fair to say, however, that the parameters for the year 2010 and especially 2011 are not sustainable for any local authority, including the city of Pesaro, and it is right on this issue there is the mobilization of all the directors of the center right and center left so that they are revised.
This balance sheet has however shown that the policy of increasing income from increased charges for the services on individual demand has begun to bear fruit if it is true that income from such established for the residential and social services as nursing home fees have increased by 100 thousand euro compared to the final, that the income from sporting and cultural services increased by € 30 000, that a number of children have earned income 328 000 € more than in the final appropriation . It is, however, forgot to say that these are services that directly affect citizens and that have increased in these values \u200b\u200bmeans going to affect the household budget.
So then is not exactly right on with what was reported that the government got their hands in the pockets of the municipal administration. I would say better than the local council, with the resources available, did not forward-looking policy choices and to support the municipal budget is due to go to get their hands into the pockets of citizens. And by the way - even if it has little to do with the budget - should be with the news of the Municipality of Pesaro and not a party newsletter or City Council because the latest issue arrived in the homes of people these days and which the special budget 2010 is absolutely biased.
I return to the balance sheet when the numbers tell us that much more could be done in terms of rationalization and cost savings based on the concept that I have already stated in the budget debate in the 2010 or rationalize that spending should not mean how does the City Council contain increase but eliminate unnecessary items and waste.
many more savings could be for example in personnel costs, which is one of the most significant budget items, when you try not to replace those who retire at the same time give you about 650 thousand euro in productivity bonuses?
And yet when it finally deletes those items disguised as consulting fees for those partnerships and incentives for the design, planning and public works sector, which affect far too heavily on the municipal budget?
Not to mention the cost of the collegial bodies of the costs for public relations and expenditure for sponsorship. Here
Councillor there are entries where our town could easily cut without affecting the citizens, without going to require retroactive figures on educational policies for families or trying to save money on evening and night shifts of the municipal police when one of the main demands by the people is to have more security and protection of the territory.
So this rationalization of expenditure should be supporting the Director of the budgets of future years because the resources available, there will be any government in office, will always be less and the negative impact will be primarily on the budgets of local authorities and then municipalities.
room for maneuver there are as there are items to be developed in terms of revenue growth and are those relating to contributions and transfers from the European community, which in the final budget for 2009 are € 10 thousand and even in the budget 2010 equal to zero while there are local authorities have made this entry a real source of funding that could alleviate, in our budget, increases in taxes and tariffs.
Ultimately, this final 2009 budget is the typical pre-and post-election, with the estimate made by a committee, and the annual accounts approved by another, where we tried to achieve the political objective which was to reconfirm that the electoral administration adopting policies and making outgoing budget absolutely sluggish economy.
But the city and citizens need more and that is what we see in the Budget in future years that will not be possible vivacchiare as in this final but they will need very different political and economic strategies.
This signal was expecting from the 2010 budget, but again we were disappointed because the basic approach of that document had to be that the protection of vulnerable groups, especially children and the elderly, families in difficulty, especially those with a number of children over two, in general, protect the social welfare and that in today's economy are the sectors most affected. So instead it was not.
Continue to engage in operations budget pretending to be unaware of the economic crisis, social and financial means to address the surface surrounding the citizens' problems without solving the same time the critical economic and financial affairs of the Municipality.
