Last week it took was a handful of hours to the governor of Tuscany Martini to say no to housing plan announced by the Berlusconi government. A few hours after the launch of the agency that reported statements by the Prime Minister arrived in record time replication of the President of Tuscany, which, based only on press statements and announcements of intentions still generic, without even having read the text of the law , so only the ideological level the house plan as a "disguised amnesty quote and" an initiative that produces only damages " and that "no help at those who need a home."
doing so, while in Italy the rest of the citizens will enjoy exceptional and innovative ways, how to expand their homes to carry out annex for the children, start building work without expensive and tedious bureaucratic procedures and this will allow a resumption of the value property, an injection of optimism in a key sector of the national economy, a job opportunity for millions of people, all in Tuscany will be plastered and bureaucratic as ever, encouraging, inevitably, squatting, the real one. Also a pity that the house plan will include the construction of a number of apartments at discounted prices to be allocated to young couples and families not yet in possession of a first home. This will also be stopped in Tuscany, or perhaps, in its haste to contradict the Premier this "detail" had escaped? All this only because the proposed Berlusconi and everything he proposes, rightly or wrongly, this must not pass. E 'already happened with the detention center for immigrants: the red Tuscany did not have it. So it is impossible in our region for law enforcement to combat illegal immigration, but so be it. Just say no to cav. And at the center.
And in the meantime, what are Tuscan recipes to address the housing crisis? What are the incentives for young couples to support them effectively in order to become the first home owners in a sustainable and compatible with today's salaries? The City of Florence a bit 'of the family has settled, and also good. These 75 families, for which first were purchased and constructed of prefabricated houses, prefabricated but of excellent quality, since that cost a total of over 3.000.000/00 euros of public money - of all sizes, from 45 to 75 square meters, and then were assigned. The agreement provided for the first year that families should not have anything in the City, the second on the beauty of € 10 per month for rent, 120 per year: whether they compared to € 800-1000 per month that most of the Florentine families are forced to bear for the installment of the rent or mortgage is really quite a privilege. But who are the beneficiaries? Evicted families with dependent children? No. Families fall from grace that have lost their jobs and homes because of the economic crisis? No. Special cases of social unrest? No. mothers? No. They are the Roma families living in the nomad camps Poderaccio of Florence. The city administration has decided, in 2003 (*), rather than evict a squatter camp and high social tension as was proper to do, to replace shacks with houses made of prefabricated borne by the entire community and to grant, once made, in 2006 (**), let within the ROM extraordinary price of 10 € a month (which is equal to the minimum rent of public housing further discounted by 30% ).
Demagogy? Racism? No, only a fitting parallel, almost aseptic, including the "unnecessary" provisions of the Berlusconi government and the enlightened government of Tuscany. Today, the policy should deal with social emergencies without prejudice of the citizens, but around here we continue to move forward with only ideological choices and dissociated from reality. While it lasts.
Florence, Vice Provincial 17:03:09
AN to the PDL
(John Bellosi)
BELOW THE LINKS TO THE SITE OF THE TOWN OF FLORENCE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RESOLUTIONS showing the houses and rent
FIXED (*)
http://dominoweb.comune.fi.it / OdeProduzione/FIODEWeb.nsf/AttiWEB/CB5A04A089F20D9BC1256CD2004EDCE0 / $ File/2003_DD_00689.pdf
(**) $ File
http://dominoweb.comune.fi.it/OdeProduzione/FIODEWeb.nsf/AttiWEB/046AE481F32CEFE1C1257227007ADBA3/ / 2006_G_00637.pdf
